The Daily Page | Madison, Wisconsin • View topic - Who should be the next Council President?

by **spanky** » Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:58 pm

nevermore wrote:
spanky wrote:I vote for the consensus building Lauren Cnare.

Lauren Cnare the Consensus Builder? I'd like to see an example of that.

All you have to do is watch a rerun of the Channel 12 election night coverage, she claims this title herself!!

by **Daisy** » Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:13 pm

When some of my friends in the past have held this position, they'd invariably go on about the thankless, largely meaningless nature of the title.

Now one of them starts a thread about the intrigue surrounding it like it's a hotly contested succession battle in the House of Tudor to determine which heir will ascend to the throne.

Weird.

by **Brenda Konkel** » Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:18 pm

Daisy wrote:When some of my friends in the past have held this position, they'd invariably go on about the thankless, largely meaningless nature of the title.

Now one of them starts a thread about the intrigue surrounding it like it's a hotly contested succession battle in the House of Tudor to determine which heir will ascend to the throne.

Weird.

The intrigue is that no one wants it, most people who have done it know to run away . . . lauren cnare wants president, maybe bruer, and no one wants pro tem . . . at least that is the word at the moment . . .

by **jjoyce** » Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:20 pm

nevermore wrote:And that, of course, would be AWESOME!! But only because I consider Ch. 12 to be an actual entertainment option.

I never watch Channel 12 anymore, but I second the nomination for Skidmore and Compton only because they're held up as shining examples of "common sense" by right-wing radio talkers in this town.

Compton, it seems, is constantly trashing her colleagues as being out of touch with reality. I'd love for the city to get a sense of her view of the real world.

by **bluethedog** » Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:24 pm

Brenda Konkel wrote:The intrigue is that no one wants it, most people who have done it know to run away . . .

Sounds like the commissioner position in my fantasy football league. Hopefully Cnare doesn't read the forum.

by **vkratz** » Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:26 pm

Daisy wrote:Now one of them starts a thread about the intrigue surrounding it like it's a hotly contested succession battle in the House of Tudor to determine which heir will ascend to the throne.

Someone's been watching Showtime!

by **spanky** » Thu Apr 05, 2007 5:11 pm

Brenda Konkel wrote:The intrigue is that no one wants it, most people who have done it know to run away . . . lauren cnare wants president, maybe bruer, and no one wants pro tem . . . at least that is the word at the moment . . .

Let em have it, suckersssss! Tim Bruer has been on the coucil for 23 frickkin years and wants to be pro tem? now that's weird.

by **Oprah** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 2:45 pm

Marsha Rummel has the leadership ability to do a good job.

by **Dodge** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 2:47 pm

Anyone But Brandon . . .

by **universitylad** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:25 pm

Dodge wrote:Anyone But Brandon . . .

I personally like Zach Brandon's common sense approach and would advise the council members to vote for him (if he would like to run).

by **Dodge** » Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:30 pm

universitylad wrote:
Dodge wrote:Anyone But Brandon . . .

I personally like Zach Brandon's common sense approach and would advise the council members to vote for him (if he would like to run).

Brandon must by stopped at all costs. ABB.

by **ShaneDog** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:20 am

Personally I think Zach Brandon sucks but he's such an attention whore maybe Council President would be a good match for him.

by **Randy New Man** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:11 am

ShaneDog wrote:Personally I think Zach Brandon sucks.

Well, he certainly doesn't have your charisma. The time I saw you testify at the Council Meeting Ã¢?? using only the name Shane (Alan Ladd is turning over in his grave) I seriously wondered how far off stage your guardian was standing with his net and leash.

You retarded putz . . . if you had been standing outside the tomb, Jesus would have turned around and gone back in.

by **Dodge** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:57 am

Randy New Man wrote:
ShaneDog wrote:Personally I think Zach Brandon sucks.
Well, he certainly doesn't have your charisma. The time I saw you testify at the Council Meeting Ã¢?? using only the name Shane (Alan Ladd is turning over in his grave) I seriously wondered how far off stage your guardian was standing with his net and leash.

You retarded putz . . . if you had been standing outside the tomb, Jesus would have turned around and gone back in.

Why, that's right Christian of you.

ABB.

by **ShaneDog** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 4:10 pm

Randy New Man wrote:
ShaneDog wrote:Personally I think Zach Brandon sucks.
Well, he certainly doesn't have your charisma. The time I saw you testify at the Council Meeting Ã¢?? using only the name Shane (Alan Ladd is turning over in his grave) I seriously wondered how far off stage your guardian was standing with his net and leash.

You retarded putz . . . if you had been standing outside the tomb, Jesus would have turned around and gone back in.

What is that supposed to mean?

Who should be the next Council President?

Who is online