Mobile? Click HERE for m.isthmus.com
Connect with Isthmus on Twitter · Facebook · Flickr 

Tuesday, February 9, 2010 |  Madison, WI: 24.0° F  
The Daily
Category From: To:

BLASKA BLOG

Blaska's Blog gives thanks for the Thanksgiving Feast


Gallery

Article Tools: Read moreRead more Blaska Blog items
Email this articleEmail this article
Print this articlePrint This Article
Email the authorEmail the author
Recommend This ArticleRecommend This Article Add to DiggShare this item

Have a happy Thanksgiving. This has been a most interesting year for your BlaskaBlogger. Suffice it to say he does not take for granted the life the good Lord has given him.

He gives thanks for the love of lovely Lisa and Number #1 son. He is thankful to be safe, warm and well fed, and free. And irascible. Let’s not forget irascible.

Is that all there is?

Marc Eisen writes in the current WI Interest magazine about the profound disappointment with the Doyle administration, now drawing to its unceremonious and little lamented close. A little over 13 months left and counting. Democrats endured 16 years of Republicans in the governor’s mansion for this?

Liberals and loyal Democrats in state service? In some ways their disapproval is even more telling because they saw the Doyle administration up close on a daily basis. And didn't like it.

Their judgment represents a particularly deflating outcome for Wisconsin Democrats: They waited 16 long years to regain control of the executive branch, only to elect a governor who couldn't articulate a coherent liberal vision for running state government in the 21st century. [WI Interest: The Doyle Disappointment]

"What depressed me the most," (former Corrections official Cheri) Maples said, "is that many of the liberals and progressives in the department said they were better treated by the Thompson administration."

Back in April, I called Doyle the Furious Nibbler.

In lieu of a legacy, the Doyle-ster seems determined to chip away at Tommy G. Thompson’s achievements like a timid lapidary instead of carving his own, Gutzon Borglum-scale monument. There is a New Testament, biblical parable about wasting talents somewhere in here.

What was first thing Jim Doyle administration did when it took office in 2003? Swore all of its appointees to an oath of secrecy. It went downhill from there.

Doyle can make a legacy by doing one thing: getting mayoral control over the Milwaukee public schools. But he has no political capital, has no idea of how to woo legislators, is an empty suit in the bully pulpit, and could not inspire a puppy dog to wag its tail if he was smeared with Alpo.

Now is the time

Paul Soglin asks folks to contribute to his WMC Watch. You can contribute to Blaska Blog’s WEAC Watch.

No organization has done more harm to Wisconsin than the teachers union.

The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel quotes an academician:

Mayoral control, he said, eliminates the "nobody's in charge culture" that leads to many school systems just keeping on doing things the way they've been done, even though they aren't succeeding overall. With a clear point of power, there is clear accountability and motivation to make needed changes, he said.

"Mayoral control has a statistically significant positive effect on student achievement in reading and math at both elementary and high school grades," said Kenneth K. Wong of Brown University, lead author of the 2007 book "The Education Mayor: Improving America's Schools." [Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel: Now is the time to overhaul MPS, researcher says]

Democratic coat holders serve their masters at WEAC. Their plan “governance of the schools even more convoluted than it already is,” says Milwaukee Magazine editor Bruce Murphy (no one’s idea of a conservative, btw).

Last week, an alternative plan for governance of Milwaukee Public Schools was proposed by Rep. Tamara Grigsby and state Sen. Spencer Coggs, both Democrats from Milwaukee. This is a plan that never would have been proposed or entertained seriously on its own merits. It was conceived with political rather than policy goals: to head off the proposal for a mayoral takeover. It seems like a scheme by the teachers union, which of course has endorsed it. [Bruce Murphy: New MPS Plan Bows to Teachers Union]

Here is Michelle Rhee, chancellor of the Washington D.C. schools, in Monday’s Wall Street Journal:

We spend more money per child in this city than almost any other urban jurisdiction in the country and our results are at the absolute bottom. … It comes down to two basic things about why we spend so much money and the results aren’t as good: First is a complete and utter lack of accountability in this system. The second is a lack of political courage on the part of most of the people who are running cities and school districts.

The Liberal Faith

Of course, M. Patricia West wants to “Keep religion out of healthcare reform” when it suits her. This practitioner of the Liberal faith accuses her ideological adversaries of the worst sin in the Liberal canon — offending her precious sensibilities.

I was deeply offended when Roman Catholic bishops lobbied Congress on health care reform in order to deny millions of women access to abortion.

Says it "subverts the principle of abortion neutrality." Some of us were deeply offended that this nation may mandate public funds for the promulgation of abortion. Might not that "subvert the principle of abortion neutrality?"

Ms. West recycles JFK’s abject promise to the Houston ministers that, if elected, he would be a bad Catholic and somehow on Monday shuck the core values he espoused on Sunday.

Did I mention that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom OF religion (contra the Gaylors) and the freedom to publicly express that religion?

The steady drip, drip

Cal Thomas: Not all revolutions begin in the streets with tanks and guns. Some advance slowly, almost imperceptibly, until a nation is transformed and the public realizes too late that their freedoms are gone. … Why would anyone trust government? … But this is about none of that. This is about liberal Democrats realizing their decades-old dream of complete control of our lives. [Cal Thomas: U.S.S.A.]

They’re all community organizers

Nick Schulz of The American Enterprise Institute reproduces the following chart. It examines the prior private sector experience of the cabinet officials since 1900 that one might expect a president to turn to in seeking advice about helping the economy. It includes Secretaries of State; Commerce; Treasury; Agriculture; Interior; Labor; Transportation; Energy; and Housing & Urban Development and excludes Postmaster General; Navy; War; Health, Education & Welfare; Veterans Affairs; and Homeland Security — 432 cabinet members in all.

When one considers that public sector employment has ranged since the 1950s at between 15% and 19% of the population, the makeup of the current cabinet — over 90% of its prior experience was in the public sector — is remarkable. (Thanks, Duane.)

The hidden tax

Bill G. Smith of the National Federation of Independent Businesses/Wisconsin

Small-business owners are scratching their heads trying to make sense of the recent healthcare vote in Washington. While American jobs are disappearing and many employers are struggling to make payroll, many on Capitol Hill want to force employers to provide expensive health insurance.

With unemployment now hitting double digits, our elected officials should know better than to impose a job-killing mandate on small employers. It's a bad idea in good times. It's a really bad idea during a recession, and has no place in healthcare reform. WisBusiness.com: Insurance mandate would be job killer for small businesses]

Good intentions over results

William McGurn in the Wall Street Journal:

Whether it's Social Security or public education, when have Democrats ever cared whether government programs are meeting their goals? The important thing is that massive health-care spending shows they care. [WSJ: The Other Senate Maverick]

The Global Climate Change scam:

Listen to a real meteorologist: Governor Doyle’s Global Warming Task Force thinks the state should control how you drive, determine what you put in your gas tank, and how much you pay for electricity. Unfortunately, the Task Force recommendations go way beyond these measures. The Governor also wants to control your home and community. State Rep. Jim Ott, formerly of WTMJ TV-4 Milwaukee.

Good one

Brother Wigderson over at the Library and Pub gets off a good one:

The Government Accountability Board will be closed on Friday, November 27th, because of a mandated furlough day. I understand Mike McCabe will be wearing a black armband in protest of all the unchecked free speech that day.

Comments (10)

From Matt Logan on 11/25/09 at 1:14 pm

David,

Happy Thanksgiving and best wishes that your thanksgiving turkey is free from pollutants commonly conveyed by runoff from construction sites!

From Tim Morrissey on 11/25/09 at 2:01 pm

Jim Ott, like most former broadcasters, is not to be taken seriously.

Happy Thanksgiving, Blaska-blog!

From Scott Colson on 11/25/09 at 2:05 pm

Blaska,

Do you have a position re: religious freedom when it comes to funding Christian Science prayer death panels?

From David Blaska on 11/26/09 at 10:03 am

?

From Mitchell Nussbaum on 11/28/09 at 11:49 am

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

 

I am not a Constitutional scholar, but it seems to me that this passage (which is from the Bill of Rights, incidentally) guarantees both freedom of and freedom from religion.  You have the right to practice the religion of your choice, but not to force me to practice it, too.

Unfortunately, some can't seem to practice their own religions without objecting to other people's religions.  This creates a problem.

From David Blaska on 11/28/09 at 6:55 pm

How are you being forced to practice someone else's religion?

From Mitchell Nussbaum on 11/28/09 at 10:35 pm

The annual "war on Christmas" kerfluffle is basically a campaign to require everyone to acknowledge Christmas, whether they practice Christianity or not.  As you may remember, a school in Ridgeway had to have special security a few years ago for its Christmas play because it wasn't religious enough to satisfy Bill O'Reilly.

Furthermore, whatever your position on the abortion issue, it's pretty obvious that Catholics and Evangelical Christians are pushing for changes in the law that will give their religious positions on abortion the force of law.   If Jews or Muslims pushed for laws that would make difficult or impossible to serve pork in restaurants, would you object?

 

From David Blaska on 11/29/09 at 2:26 pm

Yes, because I love pork. 

Now, if Catholics and Evangelical Christians pushed for laws that prohibited slavery (as they did) would you object? 

Or would you subscribe to Stephen Douglas's dictum: If you don't like slavery, don't have slaves. 

From Mitchell Nussbaum on 11/30/09 at 12:01 am

If Catholics and Evangelical Christians fought against slavery, I would find myself on the same side, but for my own reasons, which are not religious.  Back in the Sixties, a lot of antiwar and civil rights activists were in the movement for religious reasons, and I supported them, though I wasn't religious myself, and I marched with Father Groppi, though I wasn't Catholic.

But these groups were fighting for universal values that weren't specific to their religion.

By the way, Evangelical Christians in the South generally supported slavery until the Civil War, and they supported segregation until rather recently.  Even now, some Christian extremists (e.g. the Reconstructionists) support slavery as biblically ordained.

From David Blaska on 11/30/09 at 10:29 am

Some would argue that the sanctity of life is a universal value, too. Or ought to be. And 150 years ago, some DID argue that certain people were less human than others.

But I hope you are saying that people are free to promote values that they believe are universal (or ought to be universal) for religious reasons as well as non-religious reasons -- even if it means giving (should they be successful)"their religious positions ... the force of law." If so, then where is your objection?

Log in or register to comment

moviesmusiceats
Select a Movie
Select a Theater
PluggedcommentsViewedForum
Promotions Contact us Privacy Policy Jobs RSS
Collapse Photo Bar