Mobile? Click HERE for m.isthmus.com
Connect with Isthmus on Twitter · Facebook · Flickr 

Tuesday, February 9, 2010 |  Madison, WI: 25.0° F  
The Daily
Category From: To:

BLASKA BLOG

Blaska's Blog: The Stately Manor is besieged by control freaks!


Gallery

Article Tools: Read moreRead more Blaska Blog items
Email this articleEmail this article
Print this articlePrint This Article
Email the authorEmail the author
Recommend This ArticleRecommend This Article Add to DiggShare this item

To the ramparts!

Prepare the boiling oil! Even Ruben Mamoulian has been released from the dungeon for active duty.

Stately Blaska Manor, historic and gracious seat of the Blaska Policy Research Center and Experimental Work Farm, is in the gun sights of the collectivists.

The control freaks are afraid that the squire of the Stately Manor may make a free choice decision without their parental guidance.

The Kathleen has deployed government bureaucrats like flying monkeys to cast a wide net — 57,000 residential and commercial properties throughout Dane County! As always, the besiegers invoke the name of that higher god they worship: The Environment! For any depredation can be justified in her holy name.

This time, the forces of freedom have mobilized before it is too late. On Saturday, the squire of Stately Manor was given possession via the Postal Service of two large-format (11 x 6") full-color postcards personalized with my name on the cover.

Both bore the same alarum: That my property rights were at risk.

I have reproduced the mailing address side of one of the cards, which announces "David J. Blaska — Dane County Politicians are TARGETING YOU."

Your BlaskaBlogger is accustomed to being targeted. But I can imagine someone less hardened by the slings and arrows of outrageous politics getting the same message in their name.

I am reproducing the obverse side of the second postcard, the one with the calendar. Its mailing side, too, was personalized with my name, urging "Don’t Forget ..." accompanied by a full-color photograph of a red ribbon tied around a finger (think Uncle Billie in the holiday movie It’s a Wonderful Life.)

This card was sent to 32,000 property owners throughout Dane County by a collaboration of four membership organizations: Madison Area Builders Assn., Realtors Assn. of South Central Wis., Smart Growth Madison, and the Greater Madison Chamber of Commerce.

Huzzah! The Chamber has landed!

I was surprised that I own shoreland property, to say the least. However, it appears my friends in Progressive Dane and the Sierra Club who control the Dane County Board would like to change the rules. 

In their grab for more government control, the likes of John Hendrick (PD-Willy Street) and Brett Hulsey, a former paid operative of the Sierra Club, would extend shoreland zoning from its current 75 feet to 1000 feet from any lake or pond, including some retention ponds, and 300 feet from a river or stream.

Sure enough, there’s a retention pond down the way from Stately Blaska Manor.

What’s more, county zoning would, for the first time, supercede municipal zoning.

The county proposes that all properties within this expanded shoreland zone could be regulated when there is new construction or when a property owner makes improvements such as an addition, construction of a garage or accessory building or other such improvements. Property owners would have to conduct various activities such as installing special vegetation buffers, painting their houses or removing existing structures to earn the necessary 100 "points" to obtain a building permit.

These regulations go far beyond what the State of Wisconsin requires. Requests for an economic impact study to justify such legerdemain have been ignored by an increasingly arrogant county.

Two hearings are coming up this week, both from 7 to 9 p.m.:

  • Tuesday, November 17 at the Verona Senior Center, 108 Paoli St., Verona

  • Wednesday, November 18, at the Sun Prairie City Hall, 300 E. Main St., Sun Prairie

Consult Dane County Property Rights for more details.

Hey, Obama, straighten up and fly right!

Quit bowing and scraping to foreign potentates! Quit kowtowing to your equals. Here he is, bowing to the emperor of Japan, the son of World War II’s Hirohito!

Doesn’t Hillary Clinton’s State Department do briefings any more? The chief of protocol on unpaid furlough? Power Line, notes:

Obama's breach of protocol is of a piece with the substance of his foreign policy.

He means to teach Americans to bow before monarchs. He embodies the ideological multiculturalism that sets the United States on the same plane as other regimes based on tribal privilege and royal bloodlines. He gives expressive form to the idea that the United States now willingly prostrates itself before the rest of the world. He declares that the United States is a country like any other, only worse, because we have so much for which to apologize.[Powerline: Why Is This Man Bowing?]

How can we break Barack the Obama of his obsequiousness to foreigners? A small electric shock? (Dance, community organizer!)

Allahu is not so Akbar

Charles Krauthammer:

What a surprise -- that someone who shouts "Allahu Akbar" (the "God is great" jihadist battle cry) as he is shooting up a room of American soldiers might have Islamist motives. It certainly was a surprise to the mainstream media, which spent the weekend after the Fort Hood massacre downplaying Nidal Hasan's religious beliefs.

... The popular story line was of an Army psychiatrist driven over the edge by terrible stories he had heard from soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.

... They suffered. He listened. He snapped. Medicalizing mass murder not only exonerates. It turns the murderer into a victim, indeed a sympathetic one.

... Have we totally lost our moral bearings? Nidal Hasan (allegedly) cold-bloodedly killed 13 innocent people. In such cases, political correctness is not just an abomination. It's a danger, clear and present. [Explaining Away Mass Murder]

No democracy without accountability

Credit where it is due. Jim E. Doyle vetoes the Sierra Club takeover of the DNR.  Hey, kids! If you don’t like what your governor is doing with the environment, vote him out of office and elect someone better. That’s called "democracy." It IS our environment, after all. Not enough votes for a two-thirds override.

Yet one more example of Tommy G. Thompson being proven correctemundo!

Here is Spencer Black, the unelected and unappointed secretary of the DNR:

"We should now act again on our word in the face of the Governor’s most disappointing veto. I will ask Speaker Sheridan to quickly schedule an override vote. Decisions about our outdoors should be based on science and what is best for our environment, not on what is best for politicians and special interest groups."

Science? Wasn’t Marxism supposed to be a "science." Folks, you and I are corporeal beings. We share the earth with the brown bears, the gypsy moths, and the lady’s slippers.

If H1N1 and other health matters can be regulated by a governor’s appointee, if speed limits can be regulated by a governor’s appointee, if the tax code can be interpreted by a governor’s appointee, if highway safety can be controlled by a governor’s appointee ...

Platinum Subscriber Bonus Content

  • A major state agency will continue to be accountable to the people. Hooray (however briefly) for Gov. Jim E. Doyle. (Hint: remember when they used to call it "Damn Near Russia?")

  • Terence Wall is serious. The candidate for the U.S. Senate has hired Ryan Murray as his campaign manager. Murray helped get Randy Hopper elected state senator from the Oshkosh-Fond du Lac area, succeeding my friend Carol Roessler.

    Lauren Stousland has signed on as T. Wall’s chief of staff. She previously worked for both GM and Chrysler executives, in particular Lee Iacocca. Campaign treasurer is well known attorney Eric McLeod.

  • Hurrah to the appointment of the Bishop of La Crosse, former military man Jerome Listecki, as archbishop of Milwaukee. Not only is this bishop very friendly and caring, according to our pastor here on the SW side, but count him as one who believes the Catholic Church stands for something more than the church of "Whatever." Willing to call, let’s hope, nominal Catholic Jim E. Doyle on his state-ordered complicity with the Liberal Sacrament of Abortion. [WI State Journal: Catholic employers balk at mandate to cover prescription contraceptives]

  • "Deke Rivers" over at Caffeinated Politics says that he has "no problem" that Guantanamo Prisoners May Head To Illinois. What about come June when they’re crowding Door County and Al’s Swedish Restaurant?

  • Tom Barrett is in the race. His excuses for "the Hamlet Act?" The State Fair pipe attack that left him with a concussion and damaged hand and the city budget. Fair enough.

Comments (29)

From Brenda Konkel on 11/16/09 at 11:48 am

Progressive Dane controls the county board?  Good god man, can you count?

From Brian Standing on 11/16/09 at 12:28 pm

For ACCURATE information on the proposed Dane County Shoreland & Riparian Management plan, be sure to check out: http://danedocs.countyofdane.com/webdocs/PDF/LWRD/Lakes/Myths_and_Facts.pdf

More information is available here:

http://www.danewaters.com/management/water_body_classification.aspx

From David Blaska on 11/16/09 at 12:29 pm

Yes, I can count, Madame B.  I can report that PD does not constitute a numeric majority. However, the county board has more of 'em than city government and it is my operating thesis that PD denied Scott McDonell the chairmanship on his first try as an object lesson. Scott finally got the prize when he agreed to a coalition government with PD and made John Hendrick the vice chair and sprinkled a disproportionate number of committee chairmanships to the cadres. 

Logan: The county has refused to do a cost-benefit, economic impact statement. What does that tell you?  

Stately Blaska Manor, surrounded as it is by luxuriant and well manicured greenspace -- including all manner of exotic flora -- is the solution not the problem. 

We are sick and tired of ever more regulations. The Stately Manor is locked and loaded. The perimeter is well secured! Tread not!

From Matt Logan on 11/16/09 at 12:32 pm

Brenda,

Of course, as a PD member, your ability to count is unreliable, and really irrelevant to the point Blaska is trying to make which is : "Oh my God! PD is at it again, quick, go to the meeting and rant about PD's total control of the county board and your property."

While this tactic has been shown to motivate the conservative base, once they actually get in front of a government body and make this argument, they find few officials are willing to take them seriously. This of course is construed as further proof of PD's control of the board, further motivating the conservative base to try to "trow da bums out" at the next election cycle.

And what does this type of political game ultimately produce? When the conservatives are successful at winning an election this way more often than not the person who takes office doesn't understand the issues and relies on cultural values instead of facts to determine their votes.

... and that is how Thuy got elected.

In a world where conservatives were actually interested in more efficient government, I would expect them to make arguments along the lines of “what little benefit this new rule may have is dwarfed by the negative impacts on property owners”. Officials could then assess the merits of this argument and determine where the greatest public good was. Ahh, but fear is so much more effective at times!

From David Blaska on 11/16/09 at 1:09 pm

Down with "cultural values" up with "facts" as interpreted by Progressive Dane, the sole arbiter in such matters. Oh, the totalitarian mind!

From Matt Logan on 11/16/09 at 1:12 pm

David,

"Logan: The county has refused to do a cost-benefit, economic impact statement. What does that tell you?  "

Oh my god, PD is at it again, quick go to the county board meeting and...  Oh wait, maybe there is another plausible explanation?  Is there a reliable source you could go to to determine the reason?  Ah, but why bother, fear works so much better to motivate people...

 

From Matt Logan on 11/16/09 at 1:16 pm

David,

"Down with "cultural values" up with "facts" as interpreted by Progressive Dane, the sole arbiter in such matters. Oh, the totalitarian mind!"

Oh my God, PD is attacking my cultural values with their "facts", quick, go to the county board meeting and...  Oh wait, Blaska never bothered to put up any facts of his own to demonstrate that the benefits to the community at large were outweighed by the potential harm to property owners.  Such facts might be handy in reaching a compromise that worked for everybody.  Ever heard of win/win? I hear it works great in the business world.  

Ah, but why bother, fear works so much better to motivate people...


Last edited: 2009-11-16 13:21:26
From David Blaska on 11/16/09 at 1:23 pm

Logan, you can't help it, can you. You can't express a single thought without betraying your totalitarian mindset. The government wants to regulate ME but I am the one obligated to disprove the supposed benefits?! No, the state (government) has not made its case to me. That's how a democracy works, my friend. Those are democratic (if you'll pardon the word) "values." 

From Matt Logan on 11/16/09 at 1:32 pm

David,

Oh my God, the totalitarian mindset is attacking our democratic values!  Quick, get to the county board meeting and...  Oh wait, the board was democratically elected to represent the interests and values of ALL the folks who elected them, and I'd better have an argument ready that can convince them to alter their plan in a way that works for everybody...

Ah, but why bother, fear works so much better to motivate people...


Last edited: 2009-11-16 13:33:29
From David Blaska on 11/16/09 at 6:28 pm

I just love it. Logan is instructing moi about government. I was elected to six terms and served 12 years on the County Board. Logan: 0.

Jefferson believed that government which governs least governs best. Certain rights are reserved to the people. Majority rule does not excuse despotism. The state must have an over-riding interest in diminishing property rights. This shoreland scheme does not meet that test. The burden is not on the individual to prove otherwise. 

As the ancient historian Tacitus wrote: "The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates."

It's not fear that motivates people, B.B. It's freedom. 

But hey, I don't want to crimp your style, B.B. If you can make the case for the raft of new Shoreland zoning regulations. please do so now. We're listening.

From Mitchell Nussbaum on 11/16/09 at 8:28 pm

I just love it. Logan is instructing moi about government. I was elected to six terms and served 12 years on the County Board. Logan: 0.


And after those twelve years, what happened?

From lukas diaz on 11/16/09 at 9:15 pm

Progressive Dane controls the county board?  Good god man, can you count?

Progressive Dane ideas pass because they have merit and Progressive Dane supervisors work hard. That being said, PD doesn't control the county board. Otherwise the RTA would have passed by a bigger margin and there wouldn't be a big cut to human services in a year when a lot of people will need some assistance.

From David Blaska on 11/17/09 at 9:43 am

"Progressive Dane ideas pass because they have merit and Progressive Dane supervisors work hard."

Inclusionary Zoning, passed, then repealed.

$15 wheel tax -- dead on arrival.

Storing vagrants' junk until claimed -- DOA

Reducing city police staffing request -- defeated

From Jeremy Midthun on 11/17/09 at 9:43 am

I wonder....

if after 12 years, someone decided it was time to "trow da bum out"?

From David Blaska on 11/17/09 at 9:57 am

Yes, I was defeated for re-election in my 7th campaign after being elected the first 6 times. I am proud of my time in the arena, of being a participant not just a noisy kibitzer in the cheap seats.

You should try it some time, Jeremy, if you think you've got the stuff. 

I'm proud of one more thing: Never indicted!

From Jeremy Midthun on 11/17/09 at 11:16 am

... the besiegers invoke the name of that higher god they worship: The Environment! For any depredation can be justified in her holy name.

and

The squire of Stately Blaska Manor would not place himself among the pantheon of environmental saints — people like John Muir, Gaylord Nelson, or Euell Gibbons... but you may, if you like.

Somehow, I don't think you risk inclusion....

From Jeremy Midthun on 11/17/09 at 12:06 pm

 Hey, kids! If you don’t like what your governor is doing with the environment, vote him out of office and elect someone better. That’s called "democracy." It IS our environment, after all.

BUT, when "the county" wants to protect our environment, then they are the "besiegers":

The control freaks are afraid that the squire of the Stately Manor may make a free choice decision without their parental guidance.

Hey, if you don't like it, "trow the bums out"!

From Matt Logan on 11/17/09 at 1:16 pm

David,

You wrote:

"Jefferson believed that government which governs least governs best. Certain rights are reserved to the people. Majority rule does not excuse despotism. The state must have an over-riding interest in diminishing property rights. This shoreland scheme does not meet that test. The burden is not on the individual to prove otherwise. "

Jefferson also wrote this:

 "I set out on this ground which I suppose to be self evident, 'that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living' that the dead have neither powers nor rights over it."

 See that word usufruct ? I had to look it up.  Here is what I found:

USUFRUCT: The right of enjoying all the advantages derivable from the use of something that belongs to another, as far as is compatible with the substance of the thing not being destroyed or injured.

The thing we are talking about here is the Earth, and Jefferson seems to be implying that our use of the Earth requires a certain amount of personal responsibility to prevent injury to the Earth.

So it seems to me that someone wishing to live up to Jeffersonian ideals would want to find a way to ensure a reasonable level of personal responsibility toward the Earth, while at the same time doing so in the least intrusive way to our citizens.  This is the question before the county board.

Framing this as an issue of property rights demonstrates a lack of understanding of the concept of "personal responsibility"; something that until now I understood to be high on the list of conservative virtues.

From David Blaska on 11/17/09 at 2:05 pm

The day I take instruction on conservative virtues from B.B. is the day you can obey the "Do Not Resuscitate" sign.

B.B., your deconstruction of Jefferson is tortured at best. Personal responsibility, yes. A rats nest of rules, regulations, statutes, administrative code -- the intrusion of government in every decision -- is NOT personal responsibility, it is government ukase. 

Here's some plain language Tom J.:

"When the government fears the people there is liberty; when the people fear the government there is tyranny." 

Or: 

"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.”



Last edited: 2009-11-17 14:08:09
From Steve Peterson on 11/17/09 at 2:40 pm

The progressive does not believe we can make the right personal choice or be responsible.  They want to make the decisions for our health, property, well-being and anything else they can think of. 

With all the rules and regulations, I be willing to bet we all are criminals at one time or another.

From Matt Logan on 11/17/09 at 2:57 pm

David,

I agree a rats nest of rules is not an optimal outcome but you still seem to be ignoring the part of Thomas Jefferson that believed we have a responsibility to protect our shared environment.  One could argue that not living up to what Jefferson believed was a responsibility to the Earth could be veiwed as criminal, and hence a government that ignored that ethic would also be considered criminal. 

Could it be possible that those "chains of the Constitution" Jefferson refers to are there in part to prevent people with your selective historical memory from creating a government that would act in a way contrary to promoting the general welfare?

From David Blaska on 11/17/09 at 3:49 pm

No.

From Matt Logan on 11/17/09 at 4:02 pm

Based on the outcome of your last county supervisor race, I would suggest the voters may not share your opinion.


Last edited: 2009-11-17 16:28:31
From lukas diaz on 11/17/09 at 7:30 pm

$15 wheel tax -- dead on arrival.

Exactly what I was saying. Progressive Dane doesn't control the Dane County board. The PD-inspired ideas that do pass, pass because they are good ideas and PD-supervisors work hard. You know, ideas like protecting shared resources like water.

All those other things are the city council. Although in defense of IZ, it was too many cooks in the kitchen.

You should try it some time, Jeremy, if you think you've got the stuff.

Are you sure you didn't mean to say, "Put on a uniform?"

From David Blaska on 11/17/09 at 8:43 pm

"Based on the outcome of your last county supervisor race, I would suggest the voters may not share your opinion."

Or Madame Brenda's.


Last edited: 2009-11-17 20:44:41
From David Blaska on 11/17/09 at 8:57 pm

"The PD-inspired ideas that do pass, pass because they are good ideas  ..."

PD's $15 wheel tax = Bad Idea!

From Matt Logan on 11/17/09 at 9:37 pm

Us fit folks at the Logan Family Velodrome seem to have been skipped by the Property Rights Fairy:  Despite the fact that our domicile is within 1000ft of Lake Monona, we have not been gifted with the slick mailing that showed up in Blaska’s mailbox.  That’s ok, because as you all have probably guessed, I am ok with applying the conservative concept of personal responsibility to environmental matters.  Is it the “totalitarian mindset” that clouds my perspective?  Hardly.  It’s the blooms of blue-green algae I have found my kayak skimming through on Lake Monona that come to mind when shoreland zoning is discussed.

 

Those same blooms of potentially deadly blue-green algae are also responsible for my daughter’s swimming being restricted to man-made environments over the last year.  And I am sure we are not the only folks to notice that their ability to enjoy the local attractions that God has placed on this Earth for humans to share usufruct has been diminished due to environmental damage.

 

Am I going to spin up a tried and true political shibboleth in order to garner support for my position that shoreland zoning is needed?  Nope.  I am going to send the board a nice, rational e-mail explaining my position.  And I’ll bet it cancels out a few hundred of the “PD is crushing my property rights with their totalitarian mindset” e-mails they got from fear-filled Blaskites.

From Jeremy Midthun on 11/18/09 at 7:35 am

uniform?

From Tim Morrissey on 11/23/09 at 3:20 pm

Sorry I'm weighing in so late on this one, Dave.  Been busy.  Krauthammer is OK with referring to the Arabic phrase "Allahu Akbar" as the "jihadist battle cry", which, I guess, it is.  It's also the most widely spoken phrase on earth, as Muslims typically say it more than a hundred times a day.  Google "most frequently spoken word" and you'll likely get "OK", which is found (in its English form) in nearly every language.  Google "most frequently spoken phrase on earth" and you'll likely get "Allahu Akbar".

Just sayin'.  NOT making any excuse for Nidal Hassan's "alleged" murders.  Just pointing out the typical American knows so little about Muslim culture.

Log in or register to comment

moviesmusiceats
Select a Movie
Select a Theater
PluggedcommentsViewedForum
Promotions Contact us Privacy Policy Jobs RSS
Collapse Photo Bar